Timing the hire, avoiding expensive mis-hires, and setting them up for success
The Problem: Founders hire their first marketer too early, give them no budget or strategy, then wonder why nothing's working 6 months later. Or they wait too long and try to scale founder-led growth that doesn't scale.
The Solution: Hire when you have $200K+ marketing budget AND proven channel showing repeatability. Before that, use fractional/advisor support. After hire, give them a 90-day roadmap focused on execution, not strategy.
The Impact: Avoid $120K+ mis-hire burning 6-12 months. Get execution support when you need it, strategic leadership when you can afford it.
Implementation: Readiness checklist, role definition, 90-day onboarding plan, and fractional-to-full-time transition framework.
Too early, or too late. Both kill momentum.
The scenario: $800K ARR, $100K marketing budget, no proven channels. Hire VP Marketing at $140K to "figure it out."
What happens:
Cost: $120K salary + $20K budget wasted + 12 months lost = $500K+ in opportunity cost
The scenario: $3M ARR, still doing all marketing yourself. Burning out. Sales complaining about lead quality.
What happens:
Cost: Missed growth targets, burned-out founder, rushed hiring decision
The sweet spot: Hire when you have proven playbook + budget to scale it. Until then, use fractional support to build the playbook.
You're ready to hire full-time when you have ALL of these:
Readiness Signal | Why It Matters | If You Don't Have This |
---|---|---|
$200K+ annual marketing budget | A marketer can't prove anything with <$15K/month | Use fractional - you need strategy, not execution bandwidth |
One channel with <$2,500 CAC proven | They need something that works to scale, not start from zero | Use fractional - you need to find the channel first |
$2M+ ARR with consistent growth | Marketing spend makes sense when unit economics work | Fix unit economics before hiring marketing |
Clear ICP and positioning | They need to know who to target and what message works | Use fractional - this is strategic work, not execution |
Sales team complaining about lead volume | Marketing hire needs to solve a real bottleneck, not make work | Your constraint is elsewhere—fix that first |
Founder spending 15+ hours/week on marketing | Hire should free up founder time while maintaining growth | Not enough work to justify full-time hire yet |
Score yourself:
Their first 90 days should be 80% execution, 20% strategy.
Primary job: Take your proven channel from founder-run to systematic
Output: 25-40% more customers from proven channel at same or better CAC
Primary job: Plug the obvious holes in your funnel
Output: 10-20% lift in lead-to-customer conversion rate
Primary job: Test one new channel to reduce dependency on primary
Output: Clear answer on whether second channel is viable
What success looks like after 90 days:
Cost: $3K-6K/month for 10-20 hours
What you get: Strategic direction, monthly channel reviews, board-ready reporting, playbook development
Cost: $110K-160K base + 15-20% benefits + equity
What you get: Daily execution, channel ownership, team building, process systematization
$1.8M ARR B2B SaaS company: Founder-led LinkedIn outbound was working ($1,600 CAC) but founder was spending 20 hours/week on it. Wanted to hire VP Marketing to scale.
Why full-time hire would have failed:
If you're trying to decide between hiring full-time, going fractional, or just figuring it out yourself, let's talk.
We help founders assess readiness, build the playbook that makes a future hire successful, and bridge the gap between founder-led and systematized growth.
Get the strategic support now. Hire the executor when you're actually ready.
Free Growth Session - Let's Talk